RIAA: Sharing is bad
RIAA sued about 32 ISU students for downloading music in past 18 months
Kyle Ferguson
|
An activity commonly associated with college - downloading music - is coming under increasing scrutiny from the Recording Industry Association of America.
Recently, a batch of letters were sent to students at multiple universities, Iowa State included, claiming they were infringing on copyrights by illegally downloading music on their computers.
Keith Bystrom, associate university counsel, said Iowa State has received letters from RIAA in the past, but the volume of the letters has increased as of late.
"We've had three or four batches of letters sent to us by the RIAA in the last year-and-a-half," Bystrom, said. "This last group had about thirty letters, which is about double the size of the other batches."
Each letter contains the IP and MAC addresses, which uniquely identify a computer on a network, of a computer found by the RIAA to have illegally downloaded music. After being notified, the university attempts to match the addresses with a student, then sends an e-mail with a copy of the initial letter from RIAA to the student along with advice to seek legal counsel.
Shanae Diewold, senior in graphic design, was one of the unsuspecting students to receive notification from the university.
"When I first got the e-mail, I almost trashed it because I thought it was spam," Diewold said.
The communication Diewold received outlined her options.
"It said I had 20 days to go to this Web site made by the RIAA to settle the case or take the case to court," she said.
The Web site, www.p2plawsuit.com, features a prominent link for settling current cases, which involves entering the case identification number included in the e-mail from the university. The Web site then informs the individual of the amount needed to settle on a case-by-case basis. Diewold's case will cost $3,000 to settle.
"The guy who sent me the letter said the prices usually range from three to five thousand," Diewold said.
Those who consider fighting the claim and taking the case all the way to court should be prepared for significant financial consequences if the ruling is not in their favor.
"There was a file-sharing case in Wisconsin where the student lost his trial and was ordered to pay more than $200,000," Bystrom said. "It can be a big deal."
Diewold's letter detailed how she was caught.
"There's an option in Limewire to share music that I forgot to uncheck," she said.
"The investigators were then able to see my entire iTunes folder, and they took screenshots. They then got my IP address and went to Iowa State."
The most recent batch of letters sent out by the RIAA is the largest so far.
According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, more than 550 letters were sent out to 26 different universities. The University of Texas received 75 letters, topping the list. Iowa State received 32, the fifth highest.
Bystrom said that it is hard to gauge what the increase in numbers means.
"One student who got a letter only had 10 songs available for file-sharing. We can't tell what particular activity catches the attention of the RIAA," Bystrom said. "It's like speeding. You assume the law will catch the fastest speeder, or the people who download the most. But that doesn't happen all the time. "
For Diewold, however, that is not a very reassuring thought.
"I'm definitely going the safe route and telling my friends to do so," she said.
"The RIAA is really putting more emphasis on catching students."
Terms Of Use
In order to facilitate fair and focused discussion, the Iowa State Daily requires that all participants adhere to the following forum rules. All user feedback will be posted immediately upon submission and will be monitored by the user community. Forum participants are encouraged to report any feedback that does not comply with the rules. Although the Daily reserves the right to remove posts and/or block users if these rules are violated, the staff will not be actively involved in an approval or review process. These terms of use may be modified at any time without notice, and such modifications shall be effective immediately.
All letters to the editor, whether submitted to the online edition or the print edition, and all online story feedback become the property of the Iowa State Daily and may be used in print editions and online editions of the Iowa State Daily. The Daily archives all of its content, which is accessible to readers at any time. Anonymous letters will not be accepted. Names may be withheld for good cause upon request at the sole discretion of the Daily. Letters may be edited for style, space, clarity and accuracy.
In submitting feedback, you are representing and agreeing that:
Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 6
MDR
posted 4/30/08 @ 9:35 AM CST
"The RIAA is really putting more emphasis on catching students."
A demographic of people apt to be less than responsible with their computer files and most likely not able to afford adequate legal council. (Continued…)
CSP
posted 4/30/08 @ 10:53 AM CST
This sounds like a "making available" idea. See "Atlantic v. Howell" for a discussion about the whole "making available" construct that the RIAA tries to maintain. (Continued…)
bluebunny
posted 4/30/08 @ 10:57 AM CST
Next ISU will be forced to use the Great Firewall of China. I've had the bad luck to be hit by RIAA notifications twice since coming to ISU, one a case of accidental sharing and another where I had no idea what they were talking about. (Continued…)
Dave
posted 4/30/08 @ 11:08 AM CST
I would like to point out that downloading music has no legal precedent as being illegal. As of right now only sharing the files is illegal, because the user is distributing the material without authorization. (Continued…)
Brandon
posted 4/30/08 @ 11:53 AM CST
"Pay me 3,000 dollars or I'll have a judge force you to pay me 200,000 dollars." The RIAA is practicing extortion, a far worse crime than sharing a few dollars worth of music. (Continued…)
Jon
posted 4/30/08 @ 12:50 PM CST
Two things that are never mentioned in these articles are:
1) The methods of the RIAA don't stand up to legal scrutiny, their methods are unavailable for review nor are they accepted and peer reviewed. (Continued…)
Post a Comment